Should a Solicitor Trade as a Limited Company or LLP

Choosing the right business structure is one of the most important decisions for a solicitor setting up a practice. The choice between operating as a limited company or a limited liability partnership (LLP) can affect how much tax you pay, how profits are shared, and how your firm is regulated. This guide compares both structures to help you decide which model best suits your goals and professional obligations.

Written by Christina Odgers FCCA
Director, Towerstone Accountants
Last updated 23 February 2026

At Towerstone Accountants we provide specialist accountancy services for solicitors and law firms operating under SRA regulation. This article has been written to explain Should a solicitor trade as a limited company or LLP in clear practical terms so you understand how the rules apply in day to day practice. Our aim is to help you stay compliant protect client money and make informed financial decisions.

This is one of the most important structural decisions a solicitor will make and it is not a decision that should ever be taken lightly. I am asked this question regularly by solicitors at different stages of their careers, from those setting up a new practice to established partners considering restructuring for tax risk or succession reasons.

There is no single right answer. In my experience the best structure depends on a combination of regulatory requirements tax position risk appetite future plans and how the firm actually operates day to day. What works well for one firm can be completely wrong for another.

In this article I will explain the practical differences between trading as a limited company and trading as an LLP. I will look at the tax implications liability issues regulatory considerations and commercial realities. I will also share where I see solicitors make mistakes by choosing a structure for the wrong reasons.

This guidance reflects how the rules are applied in practice by bodies such as the Solicitors Regulation Authority and HMRC but explained in plain English rather than technical jargon.

The two main structures available to solicitors

Most solicitors considering incorporation are choosing between

  • A limited company

  • A limited liability partnership (LLP)

Both structures offer limited liability and both are commonly used in the legal profession. However they are very different in how they are taxed governed and perceived.

Understanding those differences is critical before making a decision.

What does trading as a limited company involve?

A limited company is a separate legal entity owned by shareholders and run by directors. If you trade as a limited company the firm itself enters into contracts earns income and incurs liabilities.

As a solicitor this usually means

  • You are a director and shareholder

  • The company holds client contracts

  • Profits belong to the company

  • You extract money via salary dividends or both

Limited companies are familiar to many business owners but in professional services they introduce some specific considerations.

What does trading as an LLP involve?

An LLP sits somewhere between a traditional partnership and a company.

It is a separate legal entity but it is taxed transparently. The LLP itself does not usually pay corporation tax. Instead profits are allocated to members and taxed on them personally.

In practice this means

  • Members are not employees

  • Profits are taxed as self employed income

  • There is flexibility in profit sharing

  • Capital accounts and drawings replace salaries and dividends

LLPs have long been popular with professional firms because they combine limited liability with partnership style taxation.

Liability and risk protection

From a liability perspective both structures offer protection but there are important nuances.

Limited company

In a limited company

  • Liability generally sits with the company

  • Shareholders’ personal assets are protected

  • Directors still have personal responsibilities

  • Professional negligence can still pierce the veil

Solicitors should remember that incorporation does not remove professional liability. Personal guarantees regulatory obligations and insurance requirements still apply.

LLP

In an LLP

  • The LLP is liable for debts

  • Members are generally protected personally

  • Personal liability can arise through negligence or misconduct

  • Regulatory accountability remains with individuals

In practice there is little difference in professional liability protection between an LLP and a limited company for solicitors. The main protection comes from professional indemnity insurance not the legal structure.

Regulatory considerations for solicitors

Regulation is a major factor in this decision.

The SRA permits solicitors to practise through both limited companies and LLPs but there are approval requirements.

In both cases

  • The entity must be authorised

  • Managers and owners must be approved

  • Compliance roles such as COLP and COFA are required

  • Client money rules apply equally

However LLPs often feel more familiar to regulators because they align closely with traditional partnership models. That does not mean companies are discouraged but it does affect how some firms experience regulation in practice.

Tax treatment is where the real differences lie

Tax is usually the deciding factor but it is also where oversimplification causes problems.

Tax in a limited company

A limited company pays corporation tax on its profits. You then pay tax again when money is extracted personally.

In broad terms

  • Profits are taxed at corporation tax rates

  • Salaries attract PAYE and National Insurance

  • Dividends are taxed personally

  • Timing of extraction can be controlled

This structure can be tax efficient where profits are retained or extracted strategically. It is particularly attractive for firms that

  • Reinvest profits

  • Have uneven income

  • Want flexibility in timing personal tax

However it also adds complexity and double layer taxation.

Tax in an LLP

An LLP is usually tax transparent.

This means

  • The LLP does not pay corporation tax

  • Profits are allocated to members

  • Members pay income tax on their share

  • Class 2 and Class 4 National Insurance apply

Tax is paid regardless of whether profits are withdrawn. This can create cash flow pressure if profits are retained in the business.

LLPs are often favoured where

  • Profits are regularly drawn

  • Members expect income annually

  • Simplicity is valued

National Insurance differences

National Insurance is often overlooked but it matters.

In a limited company

  • Dividends are not subject to National Insurance

  • Salaries attract employer and employee NIC

  • Planning can reduce overall NIC exposure

In an LLP

  • Members pay Class 2 and Class 4 NIC

  • There is no employer NIC

  • NIC is due on profit share regardless of drawings

For high earning solicitors this difference can be significant.

Profit extraction flexibility

Flexibility is another major difference.

Limited company

A company allows you to

  • Control when profits are extracted

  • Defer personal tax

  • Use dividends strategically

  • Leave funds in the business

This is particularly useful where income fluctuates or where partners have different personal tax needs.

LLP

An LLP allocates profits annually.

  • Tax is due whether profits are drawn or not

  • Less flexibility in timing

  • Cash flow planning becomes critical

That does not make LLPs inefficient but it does require discipline.

Succession and ownership planning

Future plans should always influence structure choice.

Limited company

A company can make succession simpler

  • Shares can be transferred gradually

  • Different share classes can be used

  • External investment is easier

  • Ownership and management can be separated

This can be attractive for growing firms or those planning eventual exit.

LLP

LLPs handle succession differently

  • Membership changes require agreement

  • Capital accounts must be managed

  • Profit sharing needs regular adjustment

This suits firms that expect partners to join and leave over time but can be less flexible for external investment.

Perception and commercial reality

Perception matters more than many solicitors realise.

Some clients lenders and counterparties still associate LLPs with established professional firms. Limited companies are now common but may still be perceived as more commercial or corporate.

Neither perception is inherently good or bad but it should be considered.

Banking and finance considerations

Banks often view LLPs and companies differently.

  • LLPs may be assessed based on members’ personal strength

  • Companies are assessed as standalone entities

  • Personal guarantees are common in both structures

Early conversations with banks can avoid surprises.

Client money and accounting complexity

From an accounting perspective

  • Both structures must comply with client money rules

  • Both require robust reconciliations

  • Both require clear separation of funds

However LLP accounting can be more complex due to

  • Capital accounts

  • Drawings

  • Profit allocations

  • Member tax reserves

Companies tend to be more straightforward from a bookkeeping perspective but that does not necessarily make them better.

Common reasons solicitors choose the wrong structure

In my experience solicitors often choose the wrong structure because

  • They focus only on tax savings

  • They copy what another firm has done

  • They do not consider long term plans

  • They underestimate compliance burden

  • They do not take proper advice

Structure changes later are possible but can be costly and disruptive.

Situations where a limited company often works well

A limited company may be suitable where

  • Profits are high and not all extracted

  • Partners want dividend flexibility

  • There is a plan to grow or sell

  • External investment may be needed

  • There is appetite for more complex tax planning

Situations where an LLP often works well

An LLP may be suitable where

  • Profits are regularly distributed

  • Partners value transparency

  • There is a traditional partnership culture

  • Simplicity is preferred over planning

  • There are frequent changes in membership

Converting later is possible but not simple

It is possible to move from LLP to company or vice versa but it is rarely simple.

Issues can include

  • Tax charges on incorporation

  • Transfer of goodwill

  • Regulatory approvals

  • Client notifications

  • Banking changes

This is why getting the structure right early matters.

The role of professional advice

This is not a decision to make based on online summaries or informal advice.

Proper advice should include

  • Tax modelling

  • Regulatory review

  • Cash flow forecasting

  • Succession planning

  • Risk assessment

In my view the best decisions are made where accountants and solicitors work together rather than in isolation.

Final thoughts

Should a solicitor trade as a limited company or LLP? The honest answer is that it depends.

Both structures are viable both are widely used and both can work extremely well. The right choice depends on how you operate now and how you plan to operate in the future.

In my experience LLPs suit firms that value partnership culture and predictable income. Limited companies suit firms that want flexibility control and growth potential.

If you are considering setting up or restructuring take advice early. The structure you choose will shape not just your tax position but how your firm operates for years to come.

You may also find our guidance on How do partners in a law firm get paid for tax purposes and How does Corporation Tax apply to solicitor firms useful when reviewing related SRA and accounting obligations. For a broader overview of solicitor accounting and compliance topics you can visit our solicitors accounts rules hub which brings all related guidance together.