How Do Law Firms Prepare for an SRA Inspection
An inspection by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) is one of the most important compliance checks a law firm can face. These visits ensure that solicitors are following professional standards, protecting client money, and maintaining ethical conduct. While an inspection can seem daunting, with the right preparation and internal controls, it can run smoothly and demonstrate your firm’s commitment to compliance. This article explains how law firms can prepare for an SRA inspection, what inspectors review, and how to avoid common pitfalls.
At Towerstone Accountants we provide specialist accountancy services for solicitors and law firms operating under SRA regulation. This article has been written to explain How do law firms prepare for an SRA inspection in clear practical terms so you understand how the rules apply in day to day practice. Our aim is to help you stay compliant protect client money and make informed financial decisions.
An SRA inspection is one of those events that most law firms know will happen at some point but very few ever feel fully prepared for. In my experience working alongside solicitors and compliance teams the firms that handle inspections well are not the ones who scramble in the weeks before the visit. They are the ones who treat compliance as a day to day discipline rather than a last minute exercise.
An inspection by the Solicitors Regulation Authority is not designed to catch firms out for minor technical errors. Its purpose is to assess whether a firm is managing risk properly protecting clients and complying with its regulatory obligations in practice not just on paper. That distinction matters because preparation is as much about culture systems and evidence as it is about written policies.
In this article I will explain how law firms prepare effectively for an SRA inspection. I will focus on what actually works in the real world rather than theoretical checklists. I will also share the areas that inspectors typically focus on and the mistakes I see firms make when they prepare in the wrong way.
Understanding what an SRA inspection is really about
Before any preparation begins it is important to understand the mindset of the SRA.
An inspection is not an audit in the traditional accounting sense and it is not a disciplinary hearing. It is a regulatory assessment designed to answer a few core questions
Does the firm understand its regulatory obligations
Are risks identified managed and documented
Are client interests protected at all times
Are systems operating consistently across the firm
Is compliance embedded into everyday behaviour
Firms that approach inspections defensively or treat them as a box ticking exercise often struggle because inspectors can quickly see when policies do not reflect reality.
Preparing starts long before the inspection notice arrives
The most important preparation happens months or even years before an inspection is announced.
In practice this means
Compliance processes are followed consistently
Records are kept up to date
Issues are addressed as they arise
Responsibility is clearly allocated
When an inspection notice arrives well run firms are usually calm because very little changes. Firms that rely on last minute preparation are usually under pressure because gaps start to appear quickly.
Appointing clear ownership and responsibility
Every firm preparing for an inspection should have absolute clarity on who owns compliance.
This usually includes
A COLP responsible for regulatory compliance
A COFA responsible for financial and client money compliance
Senior management oversight
Clear reporting lines
Preparation often fails where responsibility is vague or spread too thinly. Inspectors will ask who is responsible for specific areas and they expect clear confident answers.
Reviewing the firm’s risk assessment
A firm wide risk assessment is central to SRA expectations.
Inspectors will usually want to see
A documented risk assessment
Evidence it is reviewed regularly
Evidence that risks are actually managed not just listed
Links between risks and controls
Preparation should involve reviewing the risk assessment and asking some honest questions
Does it reflect how the firm actually operates
Have new services or work types been added
Are emerging risks such as cyber crime or AML reflected
Are mitigation actions realistic and in place
A risk assessment that has not been updated for years is a common red flag.
Reviewing policies and procedures properly
Most firms have policies covering areas such as
AML and counter terrorist financing
Client money handling
Complaints handling
Data protection
Conflicts of interest
Supervision
File management
Preparation is not about rewriting these policies from scratch. It is about ensuring they
Reflect current practice
Are understood by staff
Are actually followed
Are reviewed and approved appropriately
Inspectors may ask staff about policies. If the answer is I have never seen that document it undermines confidence immediately.
Client money and accounts readiness
Client money is one of the highest risk areas and one of the first things inspectors focus on.
Preparation should include a thorough review of
Client account reconciliations
Timing and frequency of reconciliations
Evidence of review and sign off
Treatment of residual balances
Transfers between client and office accounts
Accounting records and audit trails
I always advise firms to assume inspectors will ask for
Recent reconciliations
Historical samples
Explanations for differences
Evidence issues were addressed promptly
If reconciliations are late inconsistent or poorly documented they should be corrected well before the inspection.
Reviewing billing and fee transfer processes
Billing is closely linked to client money compliance.
Preparation should ensure that
Fees are billed promptly
Only billed fees are transferred from client accounts
VAT is treated correctly
Clear links exist between bills and transfers
Authorisation processes are documented
Inspectors often look for informal practices where money is moved first and justified later. That is a risk area that should be addressed early.
File reviews and supervision evidence
Inspectors want to see that files are properly supervised and risks are managed at matter level.
Preparation usually involves
Reviewing a sample of client files
Checking that risk assessments are completed
Ensuring AML checks are present and up to date
Confirming key decisions are documented
Checking supervision notes are recorded
This exercise often highlights training needs or inconsistencies between departments. Addressing those before the inspection demonstrates proactive management.
Anti money laundering compliance
AML remains a major focus for the SRA.
Preparation should include
Reviewing the firm wide AML risk assessment
Ensuring client due diligence is complete
Checking source of funds evidence
Confirming ongoing monitoring procedures
Reviewing training records
Inspectors are not just looking for documents. They want to see that staff understand AML risks and apply judgement rather than treating it as a form filling exercise.
Complaints handling readiness
Even firms with very few complaints must be able to demonstrate a compliant process.
Preparation should ensure that
The complaints policy is up to date
Clients are informed of their right to complain
Complaints are logged consistently
Responses meet regulatory timeframes
Outcomes are documented
Inspectors may ask for the complaints register even if there have been no recent complaints. An empty register is acceptable but a missing one is not.
Training and competence records
Training is another area where firms often fall short.
Preparation should include
Reviewing training records
Ensuring mandatory training is completed
Documenting CPD compliance
Recording AML and compliance training
Inspectors often ask how the firm ensures ongoing competence. Being able to show structured training records gives confidence.
Governance and decision making evidence
Inspectors look at how decisions are made not just what decisions are made.
Preparation should include
Reviewing board or partners meeting minutes
Evidence of compliance discussions
Records of risk decisions
Evidence issues are escalated appropriately
This shows that compliance is embedded at leadership level rather than delegated and forgotten.
Data protection and cyber security
Data protection and cyber risk have become increasingly important.
Preparation should involve
Reviewing data protection policies
Checking access controls
Confirming breach response procedures
Reviewing cyber security measures
Ensuring staff awareness
Inspectors may ask how the firm protects client data in practice not just in theory.
Preparing staff for inspection interviews
Inspectors often speak to staff at different levels.
Preparation does not mean coaching scripted answers. It means ensuring staff
Understand their role in compliance
Know where to find policies
Understand escalation procedures
Feel confident explaining their processes
Staff who are unsure or disengaged can undermine an otherwise strong compliance framework.
Organising documentation and evidence
A well organised evidence pack makes inspections smoother.
Preparation should involve
Collating key policies
Organising recent reconciliations
Preparing risk assessments
Ensuring records are accessible
Avoiding last minute document creation
Inspectors can tell when documents have been created in a rush. That often leads to deeper questioning.
Conducting a mock inspection or internal review
One of the most effective preparation steps is a mock inspection.
This may involve
An internal compliance review
An external adviser review
Testing processes against SRA expectations
Identifying gaps early
I often see firms gain enormous value from this exercise because it highlights issues in a controlled environment rather than during a formal inspection.
Dealing with issues honestly and early
No firm is perfect. Inspectors understand that.
What matters is how issues are handled.
Preparation should include
Identifying known weaknesses
Documenting corrective actions
Showing evidence of improvement
Being ready to explain lessons learned
Trying to hide issues or present an unrealistic picture is far more damaging than acknowledging and addressing problems.
Common mistakes firms make when preparing
The same mistakes appear again and again.
Treating preparation as a paperwork exercise
Updating policies without changing behaviour
Ignoring client account issues
Failing to involve senior management
Leaving preparation too late
Avoiding these mistakes often makes the difference between a smooth inspection and a stressful one.
Final thoughts
Preparing for an SRA inspection is not about fear or formality. It is about demonstrating that your firm is well run compliant and focused on protecting clients.
The firms that perform best are those that embed compliance into everyday practice. They keep good records review risks regularly train their staff and address issues early. When an inspection arrives preparation becomes confirmation rather than panic.
If your firm has not reviewed its readiness recently now is the right time to do so. A structured proactive approach not only reduces inspection risk but also strengthens the firm as a whole.
You may also find our guidance on What are the SRA accounting rules and how do they work and How does an accountant help with an SRA audit useful when reviewing related SRA and accounting obligations. For a broader overview of solicitor accounting and compliance topics you can visit our solicitors accounts rules hub which brings all related guidance together.