How Do I Show Funders Where Their Money Is Spent
This guide explains how charities can show funders where their money is spent including financial reporting, impact evidence, restricted funds, and best practice.
Funders want confidence. They want to know that the money they give is used responsibly, aligns with their expectations, and makes a measurable difference. Whether a charity receives grants, donations, corporate sponsorship, or public funding, one of the most important responsibilities trustees have is showing funders exactly where their money goes.
Being transparent does more than satisfy reporting requirements. It strengthens credibility, builds trust, increases the likelihood of future funding, and demonstrates professionalism. In my opinion charities that communicate their impact clearly stand out immediately because funders want reliability as much as they want results.
This guide explains the practical ways charities can show funders how money has been spent, what information funders expect to see, how to organise reporting, and how to avoid the common mistakes that weaken funder confidence.
Why Showing Funders Where Money Is Spent Matters
Funders care about impact, governance, and financial stewardship. They need confidence that their money:
Has been used as intended
Supports the agreed activities
Reaches the right beneficiaries
Is accounted for properly
Produces measurable results
When charities provide clear evidence of spending funders are more likely to:
Renew grants
Provide multi year funding
Increase the size of the award
Recommend the charity to other funders
Trust the charity with greater responsibility
Transparency also protects trustees. If a charity can show a clear audit trail it reduces the risk of challenge from stakeholders or the Charity Commission and prevents accusations of mismanagement.
What Funders Expect to See
Most funders expect information that shows both financial accountability and practical impact. Although every funder sets its own requirements, most want some combination of:
A breakdown of how the money was spent
Evidence that spending matched the proposal
Data showing the output or outcomes achieved
Case studies or examples of the work delivered
Financial records or receipts if required
A narrative summary explaining challenges and successes
A comparison between planned and actual activities
Confirmation that funds were not used for unapproved purposes
Funders are not just checking for fraud. They want reassurance that the grant or donation created real value.
The Two Types of Reporting: Financial and Impact
Showing funders where money is spent usually involves two separate types of reporting. Financial reporting shows how the money was used. Impact reporting shows what difference the money made.
Both matter. A charity can spend money exactly as planned but still not achieve meaningful results. Likewise a charity can create a strong impact but weaken funder confidence if it cannot demonstrate where the money went.
Financial Reporting: How to Show the Money Was Used Properly
Financial reporting varies depending on the size of the grant and the funder’s expectations. Most charities use the following methods to show financial accountability.
1. A Detailed Income and Expenditure Statement
This shows:
How much money the charity received
How it was allocated
How much has been spent
How much remains unspent
It should match the categories in the grant agreement such as staff costs, equipment, venue hire, materials, travel, outreach, and administration.
2. Ring Fenced Accounting
Ring fencing means keeping project funds separate inside the accounts so they can be tracked easily. This is often done by:
Creating a separate fund within accounting software
Assigning a project code
Using restricted funds
Keeping a clear audit trail
Ring fencing makes it easier to show funders exactly where spending occurred.
3. Receipts and Documentation
Some funders require proof of spending. This includes:
Receipts
Invoices
Payroll records
Contracts
Bank statements
Delivery notes for purchased materials
Not all funders need this level of detail but charities should always keep documentation for seven years.
4. Budget Versus Actual Comparison
This compares the original budget with what actually happened. It highlights:
Underspends
Overspends
Savings
Cost changes
Unexpected expenses
Funders appreciate honest explanations. If costs were different from expected the charity should explain why.
5. Using Accounting Software
Modern accounting software makes project reporting easier. Packages allow:
Project tags
Cost centre reporting
Restricted fund tracking
Custom financial reports
This removes guesswork and ensures funders receive accurate numbers.
Impact Reporting: Showing the Difference the Money Made
Impact reporting explains the human or environmental benefit funders helped create. It is the story, evidence, and outcomes that demonstrate value.
1. Outputs
These are the direct activities delivered. Examples include:
Number of workshops held
Number of people supported
Hours of training delivered
Meals provided
Items distributed
Outputs are straightforward and measurable.
2. Outcomes
Outcomes describe the changes created by the work. Examples include:
Improved confidence
Reduced isolation
Better health
Increased employment
Higher skill levels
Outcomes show effectiveness. Many funders care more about outcomes than outputs.
3. Data and Statistics
Funders value numbers such as:
Surveys
Attendance figures
Progress assessments
Feedback scores
Completion rates
Follow up evaluations
Data provides evidence. It strengthens credibility.
4. Case Studies and Stories
Human stories help funders connect emotionally with the project. Case studies might describe:
A person whose life improved
How a family benefited
How the project helped a community group
A specific moment that illustrates impact
These stories make reporting memorable and relatable.
5. Photos and Media
Where appropriate the charity can include:
Photos
Short videos
Visual summaries
Project highlights
Funders respond positively to well presented visual evidence. Charities must ensure they have permission before sharing any images.
6. Testimonials
Testimonials from beneficiaries, partners, or participants provide authenticity. They help show funders that the project has real support.
7. Evaluation Reports
For larger projects funders may expect a formal evaluation. This often includes:
External reviewer findings
Methodology description
Measurable results
Recommendations
This is more common for large grants or multi year programmes.
How to Prepare for Reporting Before Spending Begins
Charities often make reporting difficult for themselves by waiting until the end of the project to collect evidence. The best approach is to plan the reporting system before spending begins.
Step 1: Read the funding agreement carefully
It will specify exactly what evidence is required.
Step 2: Create a reporting plan
Allocate:
Who collects data
How receipts will be stored
What outcomes will be measured
Which forms or tools will be used
Step 3: Set up accounting codes
This keeps financial information clean and trackable.
Step 4: Create data collection tools
These might include:
Sign in sheets
Feedback forms
Surveys
Baseline measurements
Step 5: Tell staff and volunteers what evidence is needed
Clear expectations prevent gaps later.
In my opinion preparing early is the easiest way to impress funders with strong reporting.
How Often Should Charities Report to Funders
The frequency depends on funder requirements. Typical reporting cycles include:
Quarterly reports
Mid year reviews
End of project reports
Multi year annual reports
One off completion summaries
If reporting is not required regularly charities should still monitor progress internally. Good internal reporting makes external reporting faster and more accurate.
Showing Funders Where Money Is Spent in Annual Accounts
Annual accounts provide another layer of transparency. They include:
Income and expenditure
Balance sheet
Funds analysis
Notes explaining restricted funds
If a funder gives restricted funds the charity must show:
How much was received
How much was spent
What remains
Whether the restriction has been fulfilled
Clear annual accounts build long term credibility.
The Role of Restricted Funds
Restricted funds are one of the best tools for showing funders where money is spent. They allow charities to:
Separate money for a specific purpose
Track spending with precision
Produce fund by fund reporting
Provide clarity for trustees and funders
Funders appreciate restricted funds because they guarantee their money is used correctly.
Using Visual Tools to Improve Reporting
Many charities strengthen their reporting by using visual tools including:
Pie charts showing how money was allocated
Bar charts showing results
Infographics summarising outcomes
Dashboards showing progress
Simple tables showing spend by category
Visual reporting is easy to digest and funders often share these resources internally.
Technology That Helps Charities Demonstrate Spending
Several tools make reporting faster and more accurate.
Accounting software
Xero, QuickBooks, Sage, and FreeAgent help track project spending.
Expense and receipt apps
These capture proof of spending and organise documentation.
Project management tools
Asana, Trello, and Monday can help monitor progress.
Data collection tools
Google Forms, SurveyMonkey, and JotForm assist with outcome collection.
CRM systems
These track relationships, participants, and beneficiaries.
Using even two or three of these tools can make reporting significantly easier.
Real Examples of Good Reporting
Example 1: A youth charity
They run workshops funded by a local foundation. They send funders:
A clear financial breakdown
Photos of sessions
Quotes from young people
Attendance numbers
A short evaluation summary
The funder renews the grant for another year.
Example 2: A food bank
They use restricted funds to purchase food and pay storage costs. They show:
How many parcels were delivered
The cost per parcel
Number of households supported
Feedback from recipients
The funder increases their contribution because reporting is clear and honest.
Example 3: An arts charity
They run a creative project. They provide:
A full financial report
A video showing the exhibition
A booklet of participant work
Outcome data on confidence and wellbeing
Funders comment that the clarity of reporting made a difficult project easy to understand.
Common Mistakes Charities Make When Reporting to Funders
Some mistakes reduce credibility and make funders nervous. These include:
Failing to track spending from day one
Mixing restricted and unrestricted funds
Leaving reporting until the last minute
Providing vague descriptions instead of evidence
Reporting outputs without outcomes
Not explaining underspends or changes
Sending overly long or unfocused reports
Using unclear or inconsistent financial categories
Most of these issues are easy to avoid with planning.
How to Impress Funders With Strong Reporting
Keep it accurate
No funder expects perfection but they do expect correctness.
Keep it simple
Clear figures and clear impact always work best.
Keep it honest
If challenges occurred say so. Funders appreciate transparency.
Keep it linked to the original purpose
Show that spending aligns with what was promised.
Keep it timely
Late reporting makes funders reluctant to offer further support.
Keep it human
Stories, quotes, and examples bring numbers to life.
In my opinion a charity that can communicate finances and impact with confidence is far more likely to build long term relationships with funders.
Final Thoughts
Showing funders where their money is spent is not just a compliance exercise. It is an opportunity to build trust, demonstrate professionalism, and showcase the difference the charity makes. Strong reporting helps secure future funding and strengthens the charity’s reputation.
A good approach combines accurate financial information with clear impact evidence. When charities adopt ring fenced accounting, collect data from the start, document spending properly, and communicate results clearly, funders feel reassured that their money is used responsibly and effectively.
In my opinion everything comes down to preparation and communication. If a charity sets up systems early and stays transparent throughout the project funders will always feel confident supporting it again.