Do Solicitors Pay VAT on Disbursements
When solicitors pay third-party costs on behalf of their clients, VAT treatment can become complicated. Whether VAT applies depends on whether the payment is a true disbursement or a recharge for services supplied to the solicitor. This guide explains how disbursements work, when solicitors must charge VAT on them, and what HMRC’s rules say about passing costs to clients.
Written by Christina Odgers FCCA
Director, Towerstone Accountants
Last updated 23 February 2026
At Towerstone Accountants we provide specialist accountancy services for solicitors and law firms operating under SRA regulation. This article has been written to explain Do solicitors pay VAT on disbursements in clear practical terms so you understand how the rules apply in day to day practice. Our aim is to help you stay compliant protect client money and make informed financial decisions.
This is one of the most common VAT questions I am asked by solicitors and law firms and with good reason. Disbursements sit in a grey area where small mistakes can quietly create VAT exposure over time. I have seen firms undercharge VAT and later face assessments and I have also seen firms overcharge VAT which causes friction with clients and reputational damage.
In this article I will explain how VAT on disbursements really works in the UK. I will walk through the rules as they are applied in practice rather than theory. I will explain the difference between true disbursements and recharged costs. I will show when VAT must be charged and when it must not. I will also cover common solicitor specific examples such as Land Registry fees search fees counsel fees and expert reports.
Everything here is grounded in real UK practice and aligns with guidance from HMRC and GOV.UK but explained in plain English rather than VAT manual language.
This is written for solicitors partners practice managers and anyone responsible for billing or compliance.
What is a disbursement in simple terms?
In everyday language a disbursement is a cost you pay on behalf of your client during the course of a legal matter.
For example you might pay a court fee a Land Registry fee or a search fee and later recover that exact amount from your client.
However for VAT purposes the word disbursement has a very specific meaning and this is where many firms get caught out.
HMRC does not treat every cost you recharge to a client as a disbursement even if lawyers commonly call it one. For VAT there are two categories
True disbursements
Recharged expenses which are part of your own supply
Only true disbursements can be recharged without VAT. Everything else normally attracts VAT at the same rate as your legal fees.
Why VAT on disbursements matters so much for solicitors
Solicitors handle large volumes of third party costs. Property transactions litigation probate family law and commercial matters all involve external fees.
If VAT is applied incorrectly
Undercharging VAT can lead to assessments penalties and interest
Overcharging VAT can lead to client disputes refunds and professional complaints
Errors can affect cash flow and client trust
Repeated mistakes can trigger HMRC reviews
Because solicitors are almost always VAT registered this area is scrutinised more than many firms realise.
HMRC’s definition of a true disbursement
For a cost to be treated as a true disbursement for VAT purposes all of the following conditions must be met. These conditions come directly from HMRC guidance but I am setting them out in practical terms.
A cost is a true disbursement only if
You paid it to a third party on behalf of your client
Your client received the service or benefit not your firm
Your firm did not use the goods or services
Your firm acted as the client’s agent not as principal
Your client was responsible for paying the third party
The exact amount is recharged with no mark up
The cost is clearly itemised on the invoice
The third party invoice is in the client’s name where possible
If any one of these conditions is not met then HMRC will normally treat the cost as part of your own supply and VAT must be charged.
This is where many firms fall into difficulty because some costs feel like disbursements but fail one or more of these tests.
The golden rule solicitors should remember
If the cost is incurred so that you can provide your legal service then it is usually subject to VAT.
If the cost is incurred so that the client can receive a separate service and you are merely paying it on their behalf then it may be a true disbursement.
That distinction is subtle but critical.
Common solicitor disbursements and their VAT treatment
Let us look at the most common costs solicitors deal with and how VAT normally applies in practice.
Court fees
Court fees are one of the clearest examples of true disbursements.
The client is required to pay the fee. The service is supplied by the court to the client not to you. You are simply advancing the cost to progress the case.
No VAT is charged on the court fee itself
You do not add VAT when recharging the exact amount
The fee should be shown separately on the invoice
Court fees are outside the scope of VAT and this treatment is well established.
Land Registry fees
Land Registry fees are also normally treated as true disbursements.
The registration service is provided to the client and the fee is payable by them. You are acting as agent when paying it.
No VAT is charged on Land Registry fees
You recharge the exact amount paid
The fee should be itemised separately
This applies whether the matter is residential or commercial.
Search fees in conveyancing
Search fees are an area where confusion often arises.
The key question is who receives the service.
In most residential conveyancing matters
Searches are obtained for the benefit of the client
The search provider supplies the result to the client
You are acting as agent
In those cases search fees are usually treated as true disbursements and recharged without VAT.
However problems arise where
The searches are bundled into your own service
The search invoice is addressed to your firm
You select and use the results as part of your advice
In those situations HMRC may argue the cost is part of your own supply and VAT should be charged.
Consistency in how searches are obtained billed and documented is essential.
Counsel’s fees and barristers’ fees
This is one of the most misunderstood areas.
Barristers are providing services to your firm not directly to your client in most cases. You instruct counsel. You receive the advice. You integrate it into your work.
As a result
Counsel’s fees are usually part of your own supply
VAT is normally chargeable on the full amount you recharge
This applies even if counsel is not VAT registered
The VAT position depends on your supply not the barrister’s VAT status.
Many firms assume counsel fees are disbursements. HMRC does not generally agree.
Expert witness fees
Expert fees require careful analysis.
If the expert is appointed by the court or jointly instructed and reports directly to the client then the cost may qualify as a true disbursement.
If the expert is engaged by you to support your case and you control the instruction then HMRC is likely to treat the cost as part of your own supply.
In practice many expert fees attract VAT when recharged.
Documentation and engagement terms matter here more than labels.
Medical reports
Medical reports often feel like disbursements but frequently fail the HMRC test.
If the report is obtained so that you can advise or conduct litigation then HMRC may argue the service is supplied to you not the client.
Each case must be assessed on its facts but many medical report fees are subject to VAT when recharged.
Companies House fees
Companies House filing fees are generally treated as true disbursements.
The service is supplied to the client and the statutory fee is payable by them.
No VAT on the fee itself
Recharge without VAT
Itemise clearly
Identification and AML checks
This is an area where HMRC has been particularly clear.
AML checks are required so that you can comply with your regulatory obligations. They enable you to act.
They are not services supplied to the client.
As a result
AML check costs are not true disbursements
VAT must be charged when recharging the cost
Even if you show the cost separately VAT still applies
This surprises many firms but it is well established in HMRC guidance.
VAT treatment when the third party charges VAT
Another common area of confusion is what happens when the third party charges VAT.
The VAT treatment depends on whether the cost is a true disbursement or part of your supply.
If it is a true disbursement
You pass on the gross amount paid
You do not reclaim the VAT
You do not charge VAT to the client
If it is part of your own supply
You may reclaim input VAT if allowed
You charge VAT to the client on the full recharged amount
The VAT charged follows your own VAT rate
This distinction is essential for correct bookkeeping and billing.
How disbursements should appear on a solicitor’s invoice
Presentation matters.
A properly treated disbursement should
Be shown separately from legal fees
Be clearly described
Match the amount paid to the third party
Not include VAT
Costs that attract VAT should be
Included in the VAT calculation
Clearly labelled where possible
Consistent with your engagement letter
Mixing treatments on invoices is one of the fastest ways to attract HMRC questions.
Engagement letters and VAT on disbursements
Your engagement letter should clearly explain how disbursements and expenses are handled.
It should make clear
Which costs are treated as disbursements
Which costs are part of your fees
That VAT may apply to some recharged costs
Clear wording reduces disputes and protects you if HMRC later reviews your VAT treatment.
Common mistakes I see in practice
In my work with professional firms I repeatedly see the same issues.
Treating all recharged costs as disbursements
Assuming no VAT applies because the third party did not charge VAT
Failing to distinguish between agent and principal roles
Inconsistent invoice presentation
Outdated VAT assumptions that have never been reviewed
These errors are rarely intentional but they can be expensive.
What HMRC looks for in a VAT review
When HMRC reviews a solicitor’s VAT position they often focus on
Disbursement policies
Sample client invoices
Ledger coding of recharged costs
Engagement letters
Consistency across departments
They are not looking for perfection but they do expect a reasoned and consistent approach.
Should solicitors reclaim VAT on disbursements?
You can only reclaim VAT if the cost is part of your own taxable supply.
If a cost is a true disbursement you are not entitled to reclaim the VAT even if it was charged.
Reclaiming VAT incorrectly can create exposure just as charging VAT incorrectly can.
Practical steps solicitors should take now
I always recommend firms do the following.
Review your list of common disbursements
Classify each cost based on HMRC conditions
Update billing templates
Train fee earners on the difference
Review engagement letters
Take advice where the position is unclear
A short review can prevent years of accumulated risk.
Final thoughts
Do solicitors pay VAT on disbursements? Sometimes yes and sometimes no. The answer depends entirely on whether the cost is a true disbursement or part of your own supply.
Labels used in legal practice do not determine VAT treatment. Substance does.
If you are unsure about how your firm treats disbursements it is worth reviewing the position now rather than waiting for HMRC to raise questions later. VAT mistakes in this area are common but they are also avoidable with the right understanding and systems in place.
You may also find our guidance on How do solicitors handle VAT on counsel fees and How does Corporation Tax apply to solicitor firms useful when reviewing related SRA and accounting obligations. For a broader overview of solicitor accounting and compliance topics you can visit our solicitors accounts rules hub which brings all related guidance together.